Sunday, January 17, 2016

The Mix of Politics and Teaching

I just received notice from the National Education Association (you know, that monolithic union/bastion of power bent on having its teacher members corrupt the youth of our nation with liberal ideas) that they are considering revoking my life membership. My crime? Apparently I have too many former students who have come out on Facebook as conservative in their politics.
Okay, there’s not one bit of the above paragraph that is true (and if you’ve ever seen the “herding cats” exercise that passes for a national NEA convention you already know it), although from what I’ve read over the years that misconception is seemingly widespread. I’m proud of my service in and to that organization during the first two-thirds (or so) of my career; the NEA (and AFT) advocated and fought for teachers at a time when no one else did. Teacher unions still represent the only organized voice for the teaching profession.
But that’s not the point of this piece. I would be interested in feedback from any of my formers who’d like to chime in, no matter their political leanings. I’m not sure it will matter in terms of how I will answer the question I’m posing, but I’m curious as to your thoughts. I hope that you always felt like I respected students’ opinions, no matter how wrong you were and still are.
Okay, seriously, here’s the question I’m presenting in my own meandering fashion. I will be doing a maternity leave sub job this spring (6 weeks, sophomores, mostly just regular classes, but one Advanced Placement). The subject? U.S. Government. Starting to see where I’m going here?
Government by definition has to veer into politics, especially in an election year, which 2016 finally is, even though it feels like we’ve been in an election year for over a year already. (Style note: the repetition of “year” is deliberate if questionably effective.)
I’ve never made any secret that I lean left politically. The question (“Finally!” you say) is do I tell students up front where I stand and (try to) assure them that I don’t care about their politics, only their ability to logically and rationally defend their positions? Or do I teach (as best I can) from a position of neutrality, knowing that my biases and beliefs will inevitably leak into the discussion.
I have always (well, at least since I got a clue about my craft) believed a teacher must teach who (s)he is, her/his personality and beliefs. Anything less is, again by definition, inauthentic and kids spot phonies and wishy-washies right away. My experience is that they WANT to know where you stand and don’t have a lot of tolerance for disingenuous fence-sitters.
Clearly I didn’t turn all my students into raving lunatic liberal socialists (I feel like such a failure!) even though they might think I’m in that camp. (I did have one student, very early in my career, tell me that her father thought I was a Communist; she made it clear she agreed with him. Pretty sure she didn’t become one, though.) Neither, as far as I know, did the few conservative Neanderthals/counter-revolutionaries who somehow snuck into the teaching profession turn students into wild-eyed fascists. I don’t really think it works that way.
    But I AM interested in what you think about the approach I will almost certainly take, which is to be totally upfront. I frequently tell kids, “I will never lie to you, but I may try to find a way to tell the truth that avoids bluntness or cruelty.” (“Johnny, have you considered Speed Bump as a career?” – see, I never said that, although I did create a list of “Careers for the Otherwise Useless” that I kept locked away in a drawer during my finale as Hancock’s guidance counselor, but that’s a topic for another day [if ever].)

4 comments:

  1. Sounds like you have the making of some wonderful Socratic seminars! It is my belief that you can let students know your position on issues but more importantly, students must be able to express the why in their positions. I would surmise that you have done that your entire teaching career.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't believe a teacher should give "opinion" about anything. If it can't be undeniably proven, don't teach it. When our generation were kids, Christopher Columbus was the man who had discovered America. Mainly because that was what the higher ups wanted to feed the general masses. Turns out it was a big lie but was taught that way for years. In most cases if you tell a lie long enough it is believed to be truth.

    If what you're teaching has anything to do with politics, teach what you know to be true, not what your belief is. Left, right, in the middle. Not everyone can be correct.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't believe a teacher should give "opinion" about anything. If it can't be undeniably proven, don't teach it. When our generation were kids, Christopher Columbus was the man who had discovered America. Mainly because that was what the higher ups wanted to feed the general masses. Turns out it was a big lie but was taught that way for years. In most cases if you tell a lie long enough it is believed to be truth.

    If what you're teaching has anything to do with politics, teach what you know to be true, not what your belief is. Left, right, in the middle. Not everyone can be correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair point, but I think your Columbus example serves as a caution, because what used to be fact (and I don't believe our teachers were deliberately misleading us) changes. For example, when I taught about Jefferson, I taught that although the charges about Sally Hemmings were not new, that I didn't believe them, because they seemed inconsistent with who the man seemed to be and what he believed; and politics has ALWAYS been a dirty business. DNA changed all that and I had to alter my teaching to reflect that evidence now seems to point in a different direction. What is accepted as "truth" in history in one era is not immutable. Even the reputation of George Washington has had its ups and downs. The cause of the Civil War is still open to debate (although not in my mind). And that's history! Government and politics is lit in even more shades of gray! Furthermore, we want kids to think critically and that means asking questions. If a kid asks, I answer (and they DO want to know your opinion, which I think is a good thing because it means they're engaged). I try to also offer the counterpoint to my own positions, but obviously I'm going to do a better job on one side than the other.
      Thanks for reading and commenting.

      Delete