Friday, May 6, 2016

Rule #23 – Stereotyping Victimizes Both the Typer and the Typee

Here at Lindbergh High School, Student Council elections are in full swing, with lots of posters on the walls touting various candidates. Wit and word play abound. A couple of boys in my AP Gov’t. class created a clever poster playing off the Donald Trump campaign slogan: “Make Lindbergh Great Again.” They have encountered some of the same hostility that supporters of Mr. Trump have, with blasts on social media, posters torn down, etc. While I suspect they may actually support Mr. Trump’s candidacy, I also know, having talked to them, that their poster (see below) also represents a tongue in cheek approach to their campaign. I also expect they will be trounced just as badly as the candidate they used as a model will be (of course, I never would have predicted that he could be the presumptive nominee, so my prognosticator credentials are open to debate), at least in part because they don’t have a vilified opponent.
But it made me think. Supporting Donald Trump’s presidential campaign does NOT make make someone a racist, misogynist, or any other label ascribed to the candidate. Neither does supporting Bernie Sanders make his enthusiasts freeloading socialists looking for a handout. All the calls to put Hilary Clinton behind bars ignore the minor detail of presumed innocence on which our justice system is founded. To demean the supporters of any candidate, to stereotype them in any way, is both insulting and inaccurate. People have valid reasons for their support of their candidate, whomever that is or may have been, and there is no reason to gratuitously insult their thinking.
You want to make snarky comments or post mean-spirited memes about a candidate? Well, I doubt that is an effective strategy, but the candidates knew what they were in for when they started running and I don’t feel any sympathy for them in the least. However, I’m also willing to give them the benefit of the doubt (and, honestly, I DO have significant doubt in almost every case) that they are running because they believe that they can lead the country in what they see as the right direction. They are not evil (well, maybe with the exception of Ted Cruz – just kidding – mostly), but flawed human beings who want to serve their nation. (I even acknowledge that for Senator Cruz.)
This is going to be an ugly election. I’m going to be more thankful than ever for DVR and digital music sources. I’ve made this point before, but I worry about the next 4 years, because whoever becomes President will go into office being, not just opposed, but despised by almost half the country. That’s a bad enough problem without compounding it by transferring that aggression (and we’re not talking micro-aggression here) to the people who are supporting and voting for our eventual leader.
     We must respect the office, if not the office holder; more importantly, we must respect each other. If we lose those pieces, we’re in even bigger trouble than you think we already are, no matter where you stand on the political spectrum. 

3 comments:

  1. Funny how you call for civility as you make your little innuendo remarks about the conservative candidates you obviously do not support. You couldn't even remain neutral long enough to write this short drivel. Typical libtarded attitude. I'm certainly glad you don't teach my children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I missed the incivility on my part. Obviously Cruz is not my cup of tea; sorry you're so humor-impaired (as were so many of the students who tore down the posters) to not recognize my own tongue-in-cheek. I'm pretty sure I didn't pretend to be neutral. How I present to students is not how I express my own opinions. Surely you don't expect teachers to not have any personal opinions? I actually addressed this topic in earlier drivel ( http://bobberndt.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-mix-of-politics-and-teaching.html ). Not that I expect to be able to make inroads with anyone who uses the insulting stereotyping epithet "libtard" (thus proving my point), but Friday one of my students (I'm mostly retired, btw; just covering a maternity leave) said, "Thank you for teaching us that there are so many different ways of looking at things." But maybe that's not what you want for your children. Feel free to add a comment, but I have nothing more to say (to you). Best wishes and thanks for reading and taking the time to comment.

      Delete
  2. As I make some of the same observations in my Contemporary Issues class on a daily basis it becomes clear this election will be like none we have ever seen. Not sure if you have been watching Showtime's "The Circus" (on hiatus until the conventions) but it has done a fantastic job of trying to show how crazy of a process this has become.
    BTW, if I had any children (Lord help us) not only would I want you to teach them, I would make sure they videoed the lesson each day. It's been 20 years and I still think about things you taught me everyday.

    ReplyDelete