Showing posts with label mob psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mob psychology. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2018

Fear the Mob

– An Explanation, Not a Defense

I want to share a story. It’s one I’ve shared with numerous students over my career. Whether it makes anyone think differently or not, whether it will even give pause, I don’t know. But maybe it will explain how easily and quickly people can get caught up in a mob, in a moment.
It was the summer of my junior year in high school. I was traveling with some of my classmates on a church!-sponsored youth experience, working with other students from multiple European countries to rehab a castle in Untergruppenbach  Germany. We were, if memory serves (and, sadly, it’s not as good a servant as it used to be), the largest single contingent in the “camp.”
Conditions were, at least from an affluent American kid’s perspective, Spartan, although hardly something out of Oliver!, had it been filmed yet. We slept on cots in a room repurposed as a dormitory. But it was the food that became the bone of contention. Breakfast consisted of a kind of mush or oatmeal, mint tea, and bread. Our morning break was dark bread and more mint tea. Lunch was a repeat of breakfast. Not typical fare for us.
Our alleged leader, a young minister, apparently either took this “abuse” personally or took advantage of our complaining to try weasel his way into our hearts. (I freely admit that this is not an unbiased assessment of him; I didn’t like him, didn’t respect him, although, in my defense, his actions, and not just the one related in this anecdote, on this trip were the primary causes of my negative opinion.) In any case, about 3-4 days (as I recall) into the trip, he stood up at lunch one day, banged his bowl, and said, “We’re not taking this any more. Let’s go!”
It was, at that moment, I officially lost my mind... ...to the mob. Most (at least) of us also stood up, bowls of mush in hand, and, following his lead, stormed out the room, looking for the owner of the castle. Not sure what we were going to do when we found him; there were no chickens about, so “mushing and feathering” would seem to have been out. It didn’t take much stomping randomly through the building for some of us to decide, “Uh, this is stupid and embarrassing;” the mob lost steam and dissipated. We went from sheep to sheepishly returning to finish our gruel. 
That should have been the end of it, but it wasn’t, not for me. In retrospect, it remains one of the most frightening events of my life. I don’t pretend to be particularly modest about my intellectual abilities. But, for those brief minutes, my mind was not mine; I was not in control. I was just another anonymous follower. It is a feeling, one that strikes fear into my heart to this day, that I never want to repeat.
Imagine, now, had the grievance been serious, legitimate (at least in our perception), of long-standing, simmering on low-heat over a period of years. Cooks know it doesn’t take much more heat to turn a simmer into a raging boil, bubbling over onto the stove. If there’s no one there to turn down the heat, but instead add fuel to the fire (e.g., media and agenda-driven “leaders”)....
Think it couldn’t happen to you? Armies have relied on this semi-controlled sublimation of individual will for centuries. It’s the only rational explanation of the irrational act of charging to a certain death. Sports mobs, in and out of stadiums, are another common example. Mass hysteria is well documented. We all like to think we’re exceptional, to believe that we wouldn’t act that way, but there’s too much scientific evidence to the contrary for that to be true. Something to think about before we rush to judgment of others or absolve demagogues of responsibility.

Note: This sat in draft form for over two years, dating back to Ferguson and other events. The more things change....


Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Anger Management, Part II

Two weeks later it seems to me that not only has the 2016 election not solved anything, it has made things worse. That is not the result of who won (at least not directly), because in a country so evenly divided, some were going to be either pleased or relieved and the other half not so much.
I understand that those who either voted for Secretary Clinton (or against Mr. Trump) are disappointed, perhaps even angry, afraid or bitter. That is the way of elections when your side does not win. What has me confused, however, is the anger that continues to emanate from the winning side (although, to his credit, the candidate himself did manage to go a whole week before an outburst of thin-skinned indignation). Nevertheless, judging by the comments on social media and numerous reported incidents in the news, the trumpet section is still angry and bitter themselves. Apparently it was not enough just to win; the losers must also be discounted, degraded, and even eviscerated.
I would suggest that there almost seems to be a revenge element in play here, a desire (need?) to rub salt in the wounds (and I remind once again, as I will continue to do for as long as necessary) of the equal number of people who supported someone else; neither candidate had a majority. Why continue to froth and foam instead of taking the win and moving on? Why is that not enough? I have seen multiple instances of the election-losers being told, “Let it go!” Why can't the winners take that advice, as well? A substantial number of citizens have at least given lip service to taking a wait and see attitude, hoping (in my case, desperately, against hope) that a Trump presidency will succeed for the good of the country. That, plus his supporters, definitely does constitute a majority of the electorate. But that majority will disappear if the trumpet section continues to blare, insisting on not only having all the solos in the piece, but that everyone else play that instrument as well. We need a symphony, not a bugle corps!
It should come as no surprise that there are many people who are expressing concern about the future of the country under Mr. Trump's leadership. However, expressing such concern about the Trump presidency is not a personal attack on those who voted for him. Neither is it a criticism of those voters and their valid reasons for voting the way they did. But if you do not recognize that at least some of those concerns are also legitimate and valid, if perhaps occasionally overwrought, well, I’m not sure why you're reading this, unless you have run out of things to be angry about today. I’ve already written about the futility of teaching pigs to sing, but if you want to continue to worship at Our Lady of the Perpetually Pissed, let me assure you, from personal experience, it is a demanding church that will, eventually, exhaust you. 


Tuesday, January 20, 2015

On the Eve of the State of the Union...


… which I won’t watch, again. As little point as I see in using my time listening to political punching and counter-punching, from a lame duck president this reality-TV drama seems an even bigger waste of my time. Then tonight and tomorrow we’ll be treated to being forced choose which narrow slice of right or left wing real estate we’re going to inhabit.
I never liked forced choice questions, A or B, True or False, Good or Evil. I don’t live in a black and white world; mine is a (fuzzy) shades-of-grey world-view. Thus, I find there are no easy answers and am increasingly suspect of those who claim to have a monopoly on the truth, be they Islamic radicals or Fundamentalist Christians, right-wing Republicans or left-wing Democrats, Clint Eastwood or Michael Moore …..
Life is no longer simple (if it ever was), probably (at least in part) because people are complicated. Seldom, if ever, do we really have an either/or situation, at least when it comes to how we feel about something. While our personal choices may often appear to be a forced choice, if we’re honest with ourselves we’ve had a variety of paths to take before arriving at H-Hour.
Why do I have to go “all in” on an issue? Are you really telling me I can’t support both the 2nd Amendment and background checks? That I must pick between the 1st Amendment freedom of (pick one of the 5) and reasonable limits that protect society? Can I not support the police and those who are concerned about whether “black lives matter”? Can I not appreciate the service and sacrifice of our military men and women and have concerns about where and why they are deployed?
On these big issues we seem to be at the mercy of the absolutists and extremists who take no prisoners, admit no middle ground; they manipulate issues and events trying to force the majority of us into their particular small corners. We are also at the mercy of those political consultants who energize voters and contributions by polarizing every issue. And we wonder why Congress can’t find any middle ground?
I almost envy those who live in their narrow black and white worlds. It cuts down on listening, thinking, analyzing, concluding. I’ll finish by sharing a meme that has been posted by both conservatives AND liberals and the cartoon (above) that seems to sum it all up.* Have we finally found something we can all agree on? Nah….


* You might also try to check the cartoon on the mast-head.