Showing posts with label white privilege. Show all posts
Showing posts with label white privilege. Show all posts

Friday, December 11, 2015

The Musial Awards

I was fortunate enough to spend last Saturday night at the Musial Awards, sponsored by the St. Louis Sports Commission to honor sportsmanship in the name of my first hero, Stan Musial. Sad to say, it apparently took more than copying his batting stance (right-handed, no less) to achieve success on the baseball field. I was the guest of my new friend and co-coach at Webster this year, Tim Cerutti. The former Parkway Central coach and I had a great time together this season.
One of his former students is a wheel in the Sports Commission and gives him free tickets every year. The evening would have been worth paying for, however; I’ve certainly paid more for less. It also caused me to think (again) about the different levels of privilege; that’s a topic I plan to revisit soon, but not tonight.
The night was a welcome tonic to counterbalance the events of the past few weeks, well, months, well, let’s just say “a whiles.” It used to be that I could achieve some cathartic release by going to watch a cheesy movie, let the tears flow in the dark, and leave feeling better. I confess my eyes suffered from near constant leakage as I listened to the inspirational stories of athletes, young and old.
You can watch the program on KSDK. There are a couple showings over the next few weeks, including one on Christmas Day at noon and Wednesday, December 16 at 7 p.m. However, if you’re more modern, here’s a link to the show that you can watch on your own schedule. http://stlsports.org/awards/features/watch-the-show/
If you’re feeling down about the state of the country or the world, this is absolutely worth your time, and cheaper than any therapy.



Thursday, November 27, 2014

Thanksgiving & White Privilege

Many years ago, as part of a consciousness-awareness-raising workshop or in-service, I was introduced to the concept of “White Privilege.” I didn’t find either the workshop or term offensive. I’ve known for a long time I was a child of privilege. The SAT tests I took in the ‘60s were written for kids just like me, white, middle class, the progeny of striving parents (both first generation HS graduates, btw). It’s not the only reason I did well, but it was an advantage I had that was not universally shared, including by a significant percentage of white kids.
Neither did I take it personally or get defensive, though some of my colleagues were resistant and did feel attacked. However, I did reject the projected guilt that seemed to be expected by the presenters. It was no more my fault that I had been the beneficiary of so many advantages than it was the fault of the vast majority of kids I taught, both black and white, that they weren’t. Slavery and its pernicious, continuing aftermath was neither my fault nor reversible. I had long ago recognized that not everyone starts from the same place, that where you end up in this marathon of life is, at least in part, determined by where you start on the course (and, yes, sadly, less but still all too often, the color of your skin), and you have no control over those factors. 
But no one starts at the finish line (and I would pity them if they did; without struggle there is no growth). Maybe I did only have to run a half-marathon over fairly smooth roads instead of a 39.3 with innumerable hills, hurdles, obstacles, and even land mines (in the case of some of my Bosnian students, not a mere figurative reference). I tip my hat to those whose course was longer and more rugged than mine, but I still have to run my race, which is still not finished. 
It’s why I’m so proud of so many of my former students, because I know how tough their race was, and, in some cases, continues to be. It was a continuing frustration for many Hancock staff trying to counterbalance the self-imposed low expectations of too many of our kids, kids who openly said, “Hey, what do you expect, I’m from Lemay.” And for the majority who have succeeded or are still working to succeed, I can understand why some of them, in spite of everything, don’t feel “privileged,” and struggle to recognize what that is supposed to mean in relation to their life experiences.*
Recognizing privilege, at whatever level it exists – or doesn’t exist – is neither an excuse nor cause for celebration. Those who won or lost the genetic and/or socioeconomic lotteries are still responsible for their lives. But we all need to recognize that no matter how many obstacles we may have faced, others have faced more, and while it’s no excuse, it might just be at least a partial explanation, and true empathy mitigates a lot of anger and resentment.
But privilege is so much more than economic opportunity. I never have to worry about being looked at suspiciously when I walk into a store because of my race. I never have to worry about poor or no service at a restaurant because of my race. I never have to worry about getting pulled over by the police because I don’t “fit” in the neighborhood. The list goes on and on, the privilege, if you will, that I get simply by being white. That key component CANNOT, MUST NOT, be ignored.
So this Thanksgiving, like so many I’ve celebrated over the past decades, I choose to recognize my many blessings, with no resentment for those who may have had even more advantages, and empathy for the oh-so-many who had fewer, hope that I’ve done what I could to give back and share my blessings with those who have had a much more challenging race to run, and resolve to continue to do as much as I can, for as many as I can, as long as I can.
Here’s hoping that all who read this find their own blessings this Thanksgiving Day. Peace and love.

    
* When I first posted this piece, two years ago, a number of my formers suggested (kindly, respectfully, but not in so many words) that I was perhaps being condescending, that for any number of reasons, but often to the credit of their parents, they did not feel underprivileged, and, although I notice now that I did not use that exact term, I understand that the word (or its implication) has a negative connotation; what I meant to suggest is that privilege, like prejudice, is a continuum, not solely an either/or proposition. At whatever level of privilege each of us started, it is our obligation to recognize that there are many who have had a more challenging story to live; they deserve not our sympathy, but our empathy. 
    Incidentally, IMO there are no adequate synonyms for empathy, which is why I kept repeating it.