Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts

Friday, January 12, 2018

Shit Holes and Shit Heads

Disclaimer: I generally work to avoid this kind of language in my writing (if we're having a conversation, well, fair warming, that might be a different story and I make no promises), but in the spirit of the current occupant of the White House, "He started it. Nyah, Nyah, Nyah."
I have been fortunate to travel a lot since my retirement, including to some “shit holes,” as well as some places that apparently are more worthy to send us their citizens. Like there’s a lot of Norwegians who would give up their universal health care for our crap shoot system.*
It doesn’t take much, if any — what do call that process of investigating for facts to back up an opinion? Oh, yeah, research — research to compile a list of successful people from the so-called “shit holes” who have enriched our lives, country, and culture. One of the great things about the USA is that we never know when or where those contributors will emerge, (immigrant or not) or what their back story will be. It’s impossible to predict. 
Recent case in point: Two weeks ago a 26-year old soldier raced repeatedly into a burning Bronx apartment building, saving four people before he died in the flames. His name was Pvt. Emmanuel Mensah and he immigrated from Ghana, a country Donald Trump apparently thinks produces very subpar immigrants. (source: neo-conservative Bill Kristol – editor of The Weekly Standard)
That’s the danger of stereotyping and over-generalizing: it is not a reliable predictor of, well, anything for any individual. Pretending some level of superiority based on birthplace (and I’m not even specifically referring to country of origin, here; it could be a municipality or even a neighborhood) is incredibly arrogant, as well as wrong-headed and unrealistic. And probably, in many but not all cases, racist.
 It truly irks me when President Trump and the other drum-beaters for “American Exceptionalism” fail to realize that most people, or at least those with a sense of country, believe that their country, too, is exceptional. Those same, exceptionally loud, voices are also critical of the trend to eliminate winners and losers, the trophies for all attitude. “We can’t all be winners.” That may be true, but in the drive to make this world a better place for all of us and our children, we can’t afford losers. We do, in fact, need to find a way for everyone to, if not be a winner, have a fair chance at winning at some point.
Comparing my country to yours isn’t even a good parlor game, and what rules there may be come from those who want to stack the deck so that their homeland becomes the winner.  (The winner of what, exactly?) National pride can’t only be good when it’s ours. Who is to say that we’re better than anyone else? If we cannot have a sense of national pride without it involving crushing others, then I would suggest such pride will definitely “goeth before the fall.” (Proverbs 16:18; you might make note of a blog post from me that cites both the Bible and a pre-eminent neo-con. Time to start prepping for the apocalypse!)
I’d suggest we’d be better off with an attitude toward our country like most of us have toward golf (or any other solo activity), and working on just being the best that we can, knowing there is always room for improvement, without the need to “beat” some other country or person. In the unlikely event that I could beat you (or anyone) in a golf match, it still wouldn’t mean I was any good.
Being better than the competition doesn’t mean you’re good. Being louder than the other side doesn’t mean you’re right. Bob Dylan long ago (1965) got it right when he said, “Not to climb up any higher but rather drag you down the hole that he’s in.” (Restoring order to the universe: It’s Alright Ma, I’m Only Bleeding) We should be cheering (and helping, when possible) these countries as they work to develop their economies, education, social services, etc., even if not always by the methods we would prefer. Instead, American Exceptionalists seem to want to put a ceiling on others’ ambition so that we can continue to wave our flags and foam fingers and shout, “We’re #1!” to justify any action we take. Let’s at least not be offended or surprised when we get a different finger in return. Your foam finger doesn’t make some other country a “shit hole,” but it kind of does make YOU a shit head.

* Apparently, despite the fact that most young Norwegians speak English and virtually no young Americans speak Norwegian, there is a net migration imbalance TO Norway from the USA; in other words, more Americans move to Norway than vice versa.



Sunday, February 26, 2017

Books That Changed Me


In the most recent issue of the Webster-Kirkwood Times, the publisher ran a column about the influential books of his youth. Along with the surge of interest in George Orwell’s 1984, it got me thinking. So I am going to list my Top 20 (in alpha order; my youth lasted a little longer than normal, so this list goes into my first few years of teaching) and challenge you to list yours, as well, either annotated or not, as you choose. Just the list is on Facebook (and the chart above), but if you’re interested in why (I think) I made these choices, the reasons are annotated below.

1984............................................................... Geroge Orwell
This dystopian fiction seemed like Sci-Fi when I first read it in the ‘60s. It was my first real introduction to the importance of language and history.
A Doll’s House.............................................. Henrik Ibsen
Other Ibsen plays also resonated, but this one about breaking the (in this case) female stereotype grabbed me.
All Quiet on the Western Front............ Erich Maria Remarque
Oh, the irony and horrors of war.
Candide......................................................... Voltaire
“All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.” Not so much.
Crime and Punishment............................. Fyodor Dostoyevsky
We all want to think we’re exceptional. An existential classic.
Hitler: A Study in Tyranny........................... Alan Bullock
I thought it was great history, a brilliant psychological profile of an evil mind.
I’m Okay, You’re Okay................................. Thomas Harris
Pop psychology (a cognitive therapy). Less important in and of itself, but for where the books we read afterwards on transactional analysis (Games People Play, Eric Berne; Born to Win, James and Jongeward) that changed the way we reacted to each other and our daughter. TA has fallen out of favor, and cognitive therapies don’t work for everyone, but they sure helped us navigate some tough years. Still works, IMO.
Invisible Man................................................. Ralph Ellison
Brilliant tale on what it’s like to live outside the norms. Dramatically altered my views on life and race. Life changing.
J.B............................................................. Archibald Macleish
A play, the story of Job, told in verse. Although probably not many churches would approve. “If God is God, he is not good; if God is good, he is not God....” Made me think. A lot. Still.
Les Misérables................................................ Victor Hugo
Yes, we also love the musical, but read the book for its take on social injustice.
Man and Superman........................................ George Bernard Shaw
And many, many other plays by Shaw. Don’t skip the stage directions. The “Don Juan in Hell” scene is worth a read all by itself. If there is a heaven and/or hell, I like Shaw’s take.
Manchild in the Promised Land.................... Claude Brown
Harlem and heroin (Brown described its power that we’re witnessing today) 50 years ago. More insight on race.
Red Badge of Courage.................................... Stephen Crane
The horrors of war and combat. What we think we will do and what we do seldom jibe.
Skin of Our Teeth.......................................... Thorton Wilder
I like all of Wilder’s plays, but this is my favorite. History and future of human-kind. Still works.
Stranger in a Strange Land............................ Robert Heinlein
The sci-fi classic is more about society than science. This is one I want to revisit.
Sybil............................................................... Flora Schreiber
Although an extreme case, taught me that not all mothers are deserving of love and honor. We must recognize them as the flawed beings they sometimes are.
The Crucible.................................................. Arthur Miller
This allegory of the McCarthy Communist Witchhunt still gives pause. Could it happen again? You betcha!
The Martian Chronicles................................. Ray Bradbury
Especially “The Martian.” Find this if nothing else. What happens when you try to please everyone.
The Ugly American................................. Burdick and Lederer
As a teen-aged expat, this book about our diplomatic failures in Vietnam offered lessons on how we were being perceived by others. Given credit for being an impetus to the founding of the Peace Corps. First introduction to the Law of Unintended Consequences.
The Way It Spozed To Be............................. James Herndon
Should still be required reading for every young teacher and teacher to be. You have to teach who you are, not who you’re “spozed to be.” Also hilarious.
To Kill a Mockingbird................................... Harper Lee
Because it was the first “real” piece of literature that I read on my own (chalk this one up as an example of positive peer pressure). Fortunately, I liked it.
Yes, I know there are 21 here. I had to add one as I wrote this and didn’t want to take any out. Bonus points if you can figure out which one is the interloper.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Happy Holidays, Like It or Not!



Nov 27, '11 6:15 PM
for everyone

Tonight I was wished “Merry Christmas” once and “Happy Holidays” twice as we shopped. Neither offended me. No one seemed offended when I responded in kind.
I keep reading about all the people I might offend if I offer “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas.” So can I be offended by their being offended? (Which greeting actually qualifies as politically correct if both are potentially offensive?) Surely we have more important things to get PO’d about than what kind of greeting is used for the holidays. Hey, nothing represents the spirit of the season more than getting bent out of shape over a friendly greeting, right?
If you want to say, “Merry Christmas,” say it. I don’t care. I won’t be offended. None of the (many) Jews I know will be offended. None of the (many) Muslims I know will be offended. None of the (fewer) atheists or agnostics I know will be offended. Now maybe someone, somewhere, will take offense, but I don’t know them. But for the most part, non-Christians simply don’t care and don’t take it personally.
So why should my more inclusive greeting, recognizing the diversity of our country, a country with religious freedom as part of its foundation, be considered offensive or snidely deemed “politically correct”? Why should a Christian take it personally if I call out a joyful, “Happy Holidays!” Why should this be viewed as some attack on or denigration of Christianity? Why should my failure to wish a Christian (whom I don’t know) a Merry Christmas be any more offensive than a Christian’s innocent good wishes of a Merry Christmas to a non-Christian?
So, if you want to be offended, have at it. If you want to “unfriend” me on FaceBook because my vision of Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men doesn’t match yours, well, see ya. In either case, before you go, or get angry, or offended, allow me offer you my sincere best wishes for the holiday season, no matter what holiday you celebrate, or how you celebrate it (including the All American secular shopping spree -- stimulate the economy, please!).
Happy Holidays to one and all, and, in the words of that great secular marketing icon, Santa Claus himself, “To All a Good Night!”
P.S. For those interested in facts rather than emotion, to my knowledge (and I’ve done some, but not extensive, research, mostly because I just don’t care enough), no one has been fired by a retailer for wishing a shopper a Merry Christmas. That the big retail chains have, of their own accord, altered their circulars to incorporate ALL the possible holidays (Christmas, Kwanzaa, Chanukah, Winter Solstice, etc.) in order to sell more merchandise is a corporate decision, aimed not at assaulting Christianity but at enriching their bottom line. But if that offends you, may I suggest, “Occupy WalMart”!
edited for appearance, not content (12/2/13)