Thursday, November 29, 2012

Political Ads


Jul 31, '12 7:54 AM
for everyone
I'm almost glad that Missouri and Illinois aren't in play. At least we're not being inundated with all the SuperPAC and party ads like they are in Florida. But we still have a week to go until the primary and then we'll be inundated with senate and statewide office drivel.

I know lots of people are threatening to leave the country if Candidate X wins/loses. I think I'd like to file and absentee ballot, then leave the country UNTIL Candidate X wins/loses. But since that won't happen, I'm just going to remain grateful for DVR and the USB connection in my car.

Going Straight for Curmudgeon



Jul 3, '12 4:36 PM
for everyone
I think I'll just skip the Codger stage and go straight to Curmudgeon....

Like most men (probably most people, but men especially) I admit I'm not nearly as good a driver as I think I am. I also concede that I'm only the second best driver in my household (I moved up in the rankings when Nicci moved out on her own). Still....

Is it just me, or should people realize that reading a text while they drive constitutes "texting while driving"? I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, and the driver was being careful not to drop her ashes in her lap as she was driving with her head down. And after being passed on the right by six different drivers, she did move out of the left-hand lane (I'm pretty sure it was a deliberate change despite the lack of a blinker).

But maybe I'm just being cranky.... Blame it on the heat and old age.

Random Thoughts on the SCOTUS Ruling


Jun 29, '12 5:55 PM
for everyone
The Supreme Court's ruling on the health care reform package (if you insist on using "Obamacare, know that I've already stopped listening, because you're probably not going to make any effort at being rational) is neither the end, the beginning, nor the beginning of the end... ...of anything. It's just one more event (a significant one, I agree) in the continuing history of the United States of America.

I will confess that I was pleasantly surprised that Chief Justice Roberts apparently kept the promise he made during his confirmation hearings, to not let partisanship dictate his decisions. I say pleasantly surprised because, until this week, I had not seen (from my admittedly biased viewpoint) much evidence of that promise. Maybe he'll become the next Earl Warren, the Republican Chief Justice who also inspired cries of traitor and calls for impeachment when he stood up for principle over partisanship, for the rights of all citizens, in orchestrating the overturn of Plessy v. Ferguson (Separate but Equal) in 1954 (Brown v. Board).

The ignorance surrounding the process worries me, but I'm not an alarmist; we've been overcoming ignorance in our species for a long time and I expect that progress to continue (if not, everyone on the planet is doomed and all this is irrelevant). Still, all the people shouting and carrying signs outside the Supreme Court begs a few questions. Did those people take vacation or personal days for this? Did they not understand that this decision has been being negotiated and written for weeks, that their shouting, "Strike It Down!" or "Save our Healthcare" is kind of like telling the train to stop when it's two feet away from your face. If they want to protest (or celebrate) now, okay, I get that. But the morning before the decision was announced?!?

And what about the people who claim that they are going to "move to Canada" in protest -- Canada with single payer socialized medicine (of which the vast majority of Canadians are very fond), Canada with universally recognized gay marriage, Canada with virtually no restriction on abortions.... Okay. http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/people-moving-to-canada-because-of-obamacare

Republicans say they plan to use the upcoming decision to energize the people who already hate President Obama and were going to vote against him anyway. They might be successful. After all, they've convinced those same people that an idea they touted (individual mandate was a Republican (not just Romney's) proposal) is now a terrible idea because it was adapted and adopted by a Democrat.

But it doesn't matter. Governor Romney is promising to repeal "Obamacare" if elected. Good luck with that. Do you really think he's going to propose no longer covering pre-existing conditions? Kicking off students still living with their parents? Eliminating guaranteed health insurance? Increasing prescription costs for seniors? At the same time he is trying to balance the budget and cut the deficit, is he really going to tell people they don't have to take responsibility for paying their share for health care, to go ahead and run up the costs and freeload off the rest of us who pay premiums, that they don't have to pay this "tax"?

If elected, President Romney may very well change some parts of the bill; that may not even be all bad. Surely there are numerous ways it can be improved. But I doubt that we will ever go back to health care as a privilege of the haves instead of a right for all. So, even if you're an ardent supporter of President Obama and the health care reform bill as it was written, you need not worry about going back to Square One if Romney wins the election. And if "Obamacare" makes you cringe and fear the end of our society as we know it, you're going to be disappointed.The country has taken two steps (I think) forward (you may think backward, it doesn't matter); we may next take one or even one and half steps in the opposite direction, but it won't be, can't be, two steps. That's not the way it works.

Study our history (a novel concept, I know). That is the way we've been going, pretty successfully, for a couple centuries plus now. Steps forward, steps backward, steps to the side. Getting to where we are today as a country hasn't been a smooth journey; it won't be a smooth journey in the years ahead. There are problems remaining to be solved and new problems on the horizon. Some of our solutions to those problems will, undoubtedly, create new problems. That is our history; it will be our future.

But I believe Douglas Adams (Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy) had it right: "Don't panic."

Please, no more "reaching out"


Jun 22, '12 3:22 PM
for everyone
If I get one more e-mail or phone call with someone “reaching out” to me, I hereby declare that I cannot be held responsible for any violence that may result from people trying to reach out to me. I may just reach back and you may not like the result. If you’re on a jury, that expression should qualify as a “justification defense.”
I’ve had so many people reach out to me in the last six weeks as I deal with the paperwork for my father's death that I feel like a tourist in a Calcutta slum. The worst part is that all these “reachers” are mostly letting me know that there’s really nothing they can do to improve the situation or fix whatever problem it is that they’re reaching out to me about. Still, they continue to reach with their empty phraseology.
I mostly wish they’d keep their hands to themselves. Isn’t that something we try to teach in elementary school? So, whoever is in charge of buzz words of the month, please be advised that the shelf life of “reaching out” is over, the expiration date long past, the expression green, slimy and far more annoying than comforting.
Okay, I feel a little better now. It’s the weekend and I don’t expect anyone to reach out to me until Monday, so they might just be able to withdraw their hand before I chop it off!

It's Silly Season Time



Jun 11, '12 5:32 PM
for everyone
I'm under no illusions that this will change anyone's behavior or mind. In fact, that's sort of my theme here. I'm just going on the record.

Political advertising season is upon us, providing profits for all kinds of media (including, ironically, the so-called "mainstream" media, which will, at least occasionally, be the target of the ads they get paid to run). It is the time of year when I give thanks for DVR and a direct connection to my iPod in my car.

Despite what the polls say, there are really very few undecided voters, at least as far as the presidential election is concerned. (Try reading Isaac Asimov's classic short story, Franchise.) Those who lean toward the incumbent will find some excuse to vote for him, or at least against the challenger, and vice versa. I know it's a waste of time to suggest this, but if you think your Facebook post, tweet, etc. is going to change anyone's mind, you're dreaming. And really, do we want the leader of our country elected by people who are swayed by some snarky picture or comment on Facebook or Twitter?

So please, if you're tempted to share some ideologue's anti-Obama (or anti-Romney) rant, if you think there are simple, easy, bumper sticker answers to our nation's and the world's problems, or that only liberals (or conservatives) have THE answers, please, for all our sakes, think twice, back away from your keyboard, take a deep breath and let it go. You already know what you believe. Do you really think your re-post is going to provide the ultimate evidence to bring that final vote your candidate or party needs into your column? Really?

Sigh. Okay, go ahead and pollute the conversation stream the same way PACs (and candidates) are polluting the airwaves. It's not like the level of discourse on Facebook isn't already of marginal value, although it's at least generally more civil than the comments section of most articles. (Chalk one up for the lack of anonymity, if not proximity.)

So, if it makes you feel better, if you need random acquaintances to know where you stand (your friends already know, don't you think?), knock yourself out, but don't delude yourself that you're changing anyone's mind, any more than someone on the other side's comment would change yours. Or that this will keep anyone from posting their political rant on Facebook.

The Workplace as Family


Apr 23, '12 10:15 AM
for everyone
Five years ago the people that passed for administrators in Hancock Place broke my heart, dumping me, essentially forcing on me an unwanted divorce, closing the door on an extended family that I loved and to whom I had devoted 37 years of my life. I despaired of ever feeling that way again. Those who have suffered a broken heart can understand the wariness I felt about committing myself on that level again, opening myself up once again to the potential pain.

The love and support that I received from my new family at Schechter/Mirowitz on the death of my father has been overwhelming. Students, colleagues, parents, all have offered genuine condolences and expressions of sympathy that have made a difficult time less traumatic and painful. Even more important to me, they also helped ease the leftover hurt lingering from my departure from Hancock.

But I must also recognize my Hancock family, which was just as fabulous. I'm talking about my real Hancock family, not the now departed "leaders," but all the friends and formers from those many years I spent at "The Place." I was just as overwhelmed and thankful for all the good wishes sent my way from those whose lives I had intersected many years ago.

Now it's my turn; the carnage from the merger of SSDS & RJA to create the newly badged SMJCS (Saul Mirowitz Jewish Community School -- I swear if we create any more acronyms we're going to have to expand the alphabet) has broken the hearts of some of those new friends and colleagues, my new family. I hope, as one who has walked in similar if not identical shoes, that I have been able to help them cope in their own grieving process, knowing that someone else gets their pain. I've witnessed the same stages of grief I experienced five years ago and my heart aches for good people whose institutional memory was both a threat and undervalued.

Just as I have experienced the relationship of a new family workplace (as well as support from many in the old one), I am honored with the task of extending that love and friendship to them as they move on. My wish for them is that they will find, as I have, a new home where they can feel appreciated and loved. They certainly deserve at least that.

The Last Puritan


Apr 14, '12 8:01 PM
for everyone
On Wednesday, April 11, we enrolled my Dad in hospice. This would be sadder if he were happier. 

My father is a good man, an honorable man, a responsible man, a modest man (probably a true hero, with multiple decorations from World War II where he served, among other places, at the Battle of the Bulge; he never wanted to talk much about the war, especially his role in it). But if he found any joy in life, any contentment, any peace, I missed it. He was always more focused on his duties and responsibilities, doing what he thought and believed was expected of him.

He took pride in his work and career, spent almost entirely with Monsanto, back in the day when people loyally worked for one company their entire careers. (For those of us who bemoan the fact that companies no longer seem to value their long-term employees, maybe there was evidence of what was to become when he was essentially pushed out the door and into retirement at a time when he felt he still had something to offer besides his unwavering commitment to Monsanto.) Perhaps he even took pleasure in the time he spent at work. Still, I’m not convinced that even his work was much more than duty, another job to be done with pride and as well as he could.

Because he took all his jobs (husband, father, son, employee, etc.) seriously, he was successful at all of them, if you define success in black and white terms. I have no doubt he loved us, as best he could. If that love gave him any joy or pleasure, however, once again, I missed it, because he gave what he could but had not the ability to accept it in return. I even think he wanted love to be more pleasurable, more joyous. He tried, but I think it was either beyond him or insulated by so many walls and barriers that he ultimately had to settle, settle for, I don’t know, something less. I think he knew he was missing something, but couldn’t just accept what he couldn’t comprehend. To this day he never seemed to consider himself worthy.

The point of this is not to generate pity for either him nor or any of us, especially me. When my Mom died, I was sad for her because I felt, for the first time, in those last few months, that she had finally discovered the joy of unconditional love, especially the joy of giving it. It came almost too late, but I’d have been even sadder for her had she died without ever experiencing those feelings; my sadness now is only that she had so few months to share that joy. I’m sad for my father because, if I'm right, I’m afraid he’ll die without knowing those feelings at all.

This is a man who once told me, “Happiness is over-rated.” I’m sure he believed that. I know that I just confused him with my “joie de vivre.” He never understood how I could think the way I do, see life the way I do. And every effort I made to explain it fell on deaf ears and a closed mind, hardly fertile soil for any kind of epiphany. He was incapable of truly appreciating the remarkable life he had. Intellectually, he knew it, of course. He understood that he was his own American success story, putting himself through college, establishing a career, firmly entrenching himself in the middle class, and passing those advantages to his four sons.

He knew he was blessed, but emotionally, he couldn’t feel it, couldn’t savor it, much less enjoy it. He was a Methodist, but there, too, I found no evidence that his faith and religion brought him any peace or contentment. Really, he was a Puritan, judging his life, and those around him, in the stark colors of black and white (even shades of grey made him uncomfortable), with everyone (himself included) always failing to measure up. So focused was he on flaws (his own and others) that he could neither accept nor understand those who saw life painted with a brighter palette. The concept of love that works for me requires those multiple colors because it requires we accept others and ourselves as we are, with all of our flaws and strengths and joys balancing each other as part of a vibrant picture.

As I sit here, thinking about watching him struggle to draw his last breaths, I am thankful for the advantages he gave me, the love he tried so hard to understand and give but could not accept. I think he knows that I offered it. I hope that’s enough. I guess it will have to be.

Greetings of the Season to All


Dec 14, '11 9:14 PM
for everyone
Because not everyone here or on Facebook gets the annual holiday newsletter, I have taken to posting it here a day or two after it is mailed. Sorry, no holiday graphics.

Holiday Newsletter, Volume XIII                                                                December, 2011
Lucky 13! Thus begins the 13th Annual Holiday Newsletter, the summary of 2011 that will soon be in the books. Time continues to pass quickly and we’re thankful for each day.

We celebrated a delayed 40th anniversary last Spring with a cruise that included NASA, Charleston, Bermuda and the Bahamas. We continue to enjoy our annual summer stay on the Gulf Beaches and look forward to returning to Disney World for Becca’s second visit. Our little Energizer Bunny kept going until she fell asleep on my head as we made our way to the entrance after one last ride. Her only complaint: she thought the tram lines to the parking lots at the end of the evening should have a “fast-pass” option!
My job shifted as I was demoted(?) and have both the 6th grade classes but no 8th graders. As of January 1, 2012 I will no longer be an employee of Solomon Schechter Day School (SSDS); rather, I’ll teach at the Saul Mirowitz Jewish Community School (SSJCS), the result of a merger between the conservative affiliated Schechter and the Reform Jewish Academy. It’s kind of a nominal  change until next school year when RJA students join our building. If my math is correct (but I teach English and social studies, 2 periods of each, plus advise yet another yearbook, so don’t count on that skill), next year I will be working for my 14th principal as I enter the second year of my fifth decade in teaching. Whew! But I’m still learning and having fun, so....
I continue to coach softball at Webster, where we won our first district championship in 30 years. I have no plans to give that up until my body tells me it’s time (the message probably delivered by a softball I can no longer deflect or duck). The anti-jock has now been coaching over a quarter of a century.
Carolyn treasures her time with Becca, as do I, even if it's more limited--the downside of continuing my career. We love being able to watch her grow. Carolyn also is adding to her iPad skills and is even talking about moving to a laptop (as the rest of the world moves to tablets). You can find both of us on Facebook or e-mail her at csb8870@yahoo.com. I continue to blog and post sporadically at bobberndt.multiply.com; peruse at your peril.
Ben recently changed jobs and is working for Centene as a software security engineer; it’s a much closer drive to Clayton than Scott AFB and he’s excited about this new opportunity; his previous contractor lost its bid at Scott, but his skills were in high demand so he was able to make the transition seamlessly, despite the economy.
Nicci continues to work part-time at a friend and former colleague’s UPS store, which works out well for all. Her RA is occasionally problematical, but she soldiers on. She serves as Room Mother at The College School for Becca who attends three full days a week. It’s hard to believe she’ll be in Kindergarten next year. 
On a sad note, Carolyn’s mom died last June at 93 after a brief illness. Geraldine Shahan was a remarkable, strong woman, an inspiration to all of us who were privileged to know and love her. Although my Dad’s health continues to decline, he still manages to live independently at Friendship Village of Sunset Hills, where he will turn 91 in February.
We are truly blessed. Please accept our best wishes for healthy and happy 2012. Peace, Shalom, Salaam.

Happy Holidays, Like It or Not!



Nov 27, '11 6:15 PM
for everyone

Tonight I was wished “Merry Christmas” once and “Happy Holidays” twice as we shopped. Neither offended me. No one seemed offended when I responded in kind.
I keep reading about all the people I might offend if I offer “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas.” So can I be offended by their being offended? (Which greeting actually qualifies as politically correct if both are potentially offensive?) Surely we have more important things to get PO’d about than what kind of greeting is used for the holidays. Hey, nothing represents the spirit of the season more than getting bent out of shape over a friendly greeting, right?
If you want to say, “Merry Christmas,” say it. I don’t care. I won’t be offended. None of the (many) Jews I know will be offended. None of the (many) Muslims I know will be offended. None of the (fewer) atheists or agnostics I know will be offended. Now maybe someone, somewhere, will take offense, but I don’t know them. But for the most part, non-Christians simply don’t care and don’t take it personally.
So why should my more inclusive greeting, recognizing the diversity of our country, a country with religious freedom as part of its foundation, be considered offensive or snidely deemed “politically correct”? Why should a Christian take it personally if I call out a joyful, “Happy Holidays!” Why should this be viewed as some attack on or denigration of Christianity? Why should my failure to wish a Christian (whom I don’t know) a Merry Christmas be any more offensive than a Christian’s innocent good wishes of a Merry Christmas to a non-Christian?
So, if you want to be offended, have at it. If you want to “unfriend” me on FaceBook because my vision of Peace on Earth, Goodwill to Men doesn’t match yours, well, see ya. In either case, before you go, or get angry, or offended, allow me offer you my sincere best wishes for the holiday season, no matter what holiday you celebrate, or how you celebrate it (including the All American secular shopping spree -- stimulate the economy, please!).
Happy Holidays to one and all, and, in the words of that great secular marketing icon, Santa Claus himself, “To All a Good Night!”
P.S. For those interested in facts rather than emotion, to my knowledge (and I’ve done some, but not extensive, research, mostly because I just don’t care enough), no one has been fired by a retailer for wishing a shopper a Merry Christmas. That the big retail chains have, of their own accord, altered their circulars to incorporate ALL the possible holidays (Christmas, Kwanzaa, Chanukah, Winter Solstice, etc.) in order to sell more merchandise is a corporate decision, aimed not at assaulting Christianity but at enriching their bottom line. But if that offends you, may I suggest, “Occupy WalMart”!
edited for appearance, not content (12/2/13)


Decisions, Decisions



Nov 2, '11 12:37 PM
for everyone
Given the time lag since I first posted, it was probably obvious that  I've decided to pass on the "opportunity" (to be appointed temporarily and then run for a seat on the Junior College District Board of Trustees) for a variety of reasons.

As I've previously noted, my focus has narrowed over the years. I started my career trying to save the world (in general, and education, in particular -- it was a Child of the '60s thing), refocused to the district of Hancock Place, refocused again to Hancock High School, refocused again to the students with whom I dealt daily (or at least regularly), refocused again, well, you get the picture. To broaden that focus to being at least partly responsible for over 5000 employees and probably at least four times that many students would represent a 540° turn (and I get dizzy so easily any more!).

Second, not only has my focused shifted, but my priorities have changed. I don't spend much time looking backward or regretting "the stumbles and falls [that] brought me here" (Ben Folds, I Am the Luckiest), but I recognize that my priorities were misplaced when I was more ambitious. That may be too strong, but I've come to realize that it wasn't really a good thing when my daughter's first complete sentence was, "Daddy's at a meeting." I appreciate time more and want to spend as much of it as I can with those I love. Meetings don't really fit in with that objective.

Third, because I figure I have at least another year left in me at Schechter (officially renamed, as of 1/1/12, the Saul Mirowitz Jewish Community School -- I'm guessing it will be shorted to JCS) and because I expect we won't be in "coast mode" trying to create an effective school culture that will require significant energy in assimilation and integration, to say nothing of the mundane demands for academic excellence, I don't anticipate much in the way of free time to devote to the JCD. (I am convinced that we will soon need to add letters to the alphabet to accommodate the ever-increasing demands for acronyms.)

Finally, I was pretty much operating on fumes by the time softball ended. My body will tell me when I can't do that any more (the evidence will be some kind of smashed face or broken bone because I can't avoid a thrown or batted ball -- I've already conceded to using a screen to throw BP -- too many close calls even off the JV bats) and every time I think I might be ready to stop teaching, the stock market convinces me how terrible an idea that is! Of course, that may never change, or at least not for a long while. But that's a topic for another day.

In short (also not a strength and certainly not on the campaign trail), no need to start looking for yard signs emblazoned with my name any time soon. Still, it was nice to be considered.

Quandry


Oct 29, '11 3:11 PM
for everyone
Feel free to comment on this, but I'm mostly writing to help me sort out my own thoughts.

I'm being recruited to run for the Junior College Board of Trustees seat in April. It's certainly flattering, but whatever political aspirations I ever fantasized about went away many years ago. (Okay, I still sort of fantasize debating [and shredding, of course] wing nuts on the right, but I do recognize it's just fantasy). I certainly don't figure this to be the beginning of a career in politics; I'm not that delusional, nor would I really want to undergo the personal scrutiny and truth-twisting that automatically comes with the territory of partisan politics these days. Neither do I expect a phone call from Senator Danforth and the nascent third-party movement any time soon.

I do, however, believe in the value of the Junior College District, that it represents perhaps our best hope to train or retrain Americans to compete in the increasingly fluid local and world labor markets, to offer the opportunity for regular people to retain or attain middle class status in a country where that membership is shrinking, almost daily, it seems. I also have enough ego to think that I might bring something to the party besides chips and dip, that I could articulately and pragmatically advocate for all the constituencies involved in the JCD, assuming that I could actually win an election.

But should I commit to an election that I don't really care if I win or not? I certainly have no real intention (nor do I want to make the time) of campaigning, going door-to-door, telephoning, fund-raising (ughh!), etc. If someone wants to put my name out there and make some yard signs, fine; it might give me the opportunity to serve.

On the other hand, I've just come off my busy time when all my energy has been pretty well sapped with teaching and coaching. I'm only now starting to catch my breath. The thought of adding more evenings of meetings doesn't exactly fill me with excitement.

My father is needing more of my time, more than I've really had to give him since August until just about now. His needs are not going to decrease, which means the responsibilities of my brothers and me are going to increase.

My school will also be different next year (merged and, presumably, bigger)  and while I'm reasonably confident I'll still have a job, I don't know what it will look like or whether I'll want what is offered. I'll have yet another "principal" (Head of School) and new challenges that will keep me out of coast-mode (not that that's a bad thing, but will require continued and possibly expanded time commitments).

If I were sure I would be well and truly retired next year, the JCD position would be more attractive (having no responsibilities may sound good, but would not be good for me), but I don't think there will be any certainty about that in the near future, and I'd hate to commit to something I could only give a half-uh-baked effort to.

On the other hand (just how many hands does that make now?), this is kind of a cool opportunity that I'd also hate to pass it up. There's no guarantee, of course, that I'd win (especially with my ambivalence),  although because I'd run in and represent the South County/City area, I expect I'd have some, albeit limited, positive name recognition among friends and formers. I don't know how hotly contested these seats are.

So I sit and ponder, procrastinating about making the phone call to even discuss the possibility of becoming a candidate. As I often told students, no decision is also a decision. Throwing yourself into the unknown fits into the "Grow or die" mode to which I've always at least given lip-service. So many aphorisms, so few that fit perfectly.

Stay tuned.

Thoughts on Labor Day


Sep 5, '11 6:15 PM
for everyone
• Child labor laws
• 40-hour work week
• Overtime
• Workmen's Compensation
• Non-discriminatory hiring practices
• Workplace safety laws
• Unemployment compensation
• Paid vacations
• Retirement pensions

This is just a partial list of gains for workers granted voluntarily through the generosity of businesses concerned for their employees. Oh, wait, no, these things that we now define as givens for a good job came as the result of decades of struggle by organized groups of workers known as unions.

Are unions perfect? Of course not. But we owe them a debt that we need to try to pay forward if we are to preserve the standard of living we want for our children. 

The rise of the middle class in America parallels the rise of union jobs and union membership. The shrinking of the middle class in America is directly correlated to the decline in unions and the number of union jobs.  The parallel is clear and ongoing. Ignore it at your peril.

So thanks to those brave men and women who fought for upward mobility for those who came before and who continue to fight bravely to preserve the American way of life.

The Schechter Saga, Book 3, Chapter 1: Looking Back & Ahead


In less than two weeks I start my fifth decade in teaching. Little did I know when my churning stomach and I said, "Good morning" to my first class of freshmen for English in Room 200 (the room disappeared long before the building that housed it) where I would end up, starting my 41st year. I could never have predicted the joys and rewards of what was, I must admit, an accidental career.

(With apologies to those who know the story) I was, at best, an indifferent college student who changed majors four times (none were education; in fact, late in my junior year at UM-St. Louis {I was a French major at the time}, all of the other class members had espoused teaching as their career goal. My response, "I don't know, but it won't be teaching.")

I even considered joining my (future) wife in the nursing field, but couldn't bear the thought of more school and science classes (groan). So this (now) history major, faced with the limited career options of selling encyclopedias or insurance, started taking classes for teaching certification. I benefitted from several fortuitous circumstances. First, standards were low at the time (my GPA wouldn't qualify today). Second, I had a great student-teaching experience at McCluer High School (on the evening shift, teaching 10th grade world history from about noon to 6:30); my cooperating teacher took more interest cruising with the Moline Acres Police than his classroom and left me alone to learn how to teach. The final piece of luck was that his students didn't want to do anything that might cause him to spend any more time in the classroom than he had to, so I avoided some typical student-teaching traps.

Equally lucky for me, Hancock Place standards weren't all that high either (and probably candidates with French and English certification not that common) so I even managed to find a job and start a career that has rewarded me beyond measure, helped me grow as a person, and allowed me to give back to my profession and students.

One thing I've learned: the expression "normal year" is an oxymoron. In the ed-game there are no normal years; heck, there aren't even that many normal days! But I go to school/work every day looking forward to the journey that I take with my students, sharing and learning together. I've taught every age of middle and high school, English, French, American and world history, political science, psychology, law, business law! (at a time when I knew nothing about either business OR law), journalism, drama, freshman (college) composition, masters classes for Webster College, and, of course, did school counseling; I've coached softball, school publications, mock trial teams, directed drama productions. I was also a teaching profession "true believer," dedicated to empowering teachers so we could do our jobs better and earn respect as professionals.

Although not all of these efforts yielded equal results, I tried to approach all of them with equal enthusiasm, tried to do or make things better. As I begin my third year at Schechter looking forward to working with my "sixers" (and, once more into the breach, advising yet another yearbook -- #14, but who's counting?), I'm just as excited, but not quite as nervous (or maybe my stomach is so well insulated now that I don't notice the flip-flops quite as much) as that day in 1971.

Stay tuned. Let the meetings begin!

A Tribute


Jun 30, '11 2:49 PM
for everyone
Why wasn't this a classic American underclass train wreck?

Her "mother" left town and returned a couple days later on the train with the baby, which she raised through a succession of at least seven (7) step-fathers (and, by reputation, other temporary visitors), pregnant at 16, thus not allowed to finish her senior year, married a man12 years her senior a couple years later and bore four more children, living in a Chicago tenement and on a hardscrabble farm outside Centralia, Illinois. The family did, in fact, have a pot (or two, one upstairs, one downstairs) to pee in for those cold nights when a trip to the outhouse was impractical; but neither well went dry, the garden grew, and government cheese helped. You get the picture.

Or at least you might think so. But, with her husband, John (who had his own story, including being told at 14 by his father that he "wasn't needed around here anymore" and sent packing to his sister's), she raised five successful children, productive citizens all. The last 2-3 years weren't kind to her, but she always said she'd had a good life. 

I was privileged to marry one of her daughters and was touched by the honor and respect paid to her by those children and grandchildren at her funeral. She'd have been (or was, I'm sure, depending on your concept of the afterlife) pleased by the musical tribute (no words could have been as appropriate) offered by two of her grandchildren, Kevin and Tricia.

So, again, why wasn't this a classic American underclass train wreck? I don't have the answer. But I will suggest that the winners of all the "Survivor" television shows wouldn't have been able to compete with her in this real world challenge.

So, here's to you Geraldine Shahan (1918-2011), an American success story of overcoming the odds. You have my respect, admiration, love and thanks. 

Berndt's Rules o' Life, 1.0



May 27, '11 11:11 AM
for everyone
It's graduation season, time to share advice to graduates, current and former. Not that anyone asked me! All "rules" subject to change and editorial review. Not all concepts are original, but most of the phrasing is.

1. You don't get a discount on the Happy Meal just because you're not....
2. Try to go where you're invited, stay away from where you're not.
3. It's better to ask forgiveness than permission.
4. Being "right" is over-rated.
5. Admitting that you were/are wrong is both cathartic and liberating.
6. Don't worry about what other people are thinking of you, because, in fact, they're not.
7. If one sincere apology (okay, maybe two) isn't enough, then forgiveness isn't really on the agenda.
8. Be a good audience.
9. You never know the limits of your reach until you fall on your face.
10. If you don't like yourself, really, what's the point for anyone else?
11. Your ability to love increases in direct proportion to usage.
12. Find satisfaction in achieving the best result possible instead of frustration over failing to achieve the best possible result.
13. Most people are capable of redemption, but only if you allow it.
14. There is no "undo-key" for life, but there are a multitude of examples of people who have overcome more obstacles than you.
15. If you can never be satisfied, don't be surprised when people stop trying.
16. It's easier to fix the flaws of others than to recognize, much less deal with, your own.
17. Life is a marathon, not a sprint.
18. Wherever you go, there you are.*

19. If you want to make a fresh start, it will require more than a change in location.
20. If you're both the host and guest of honor at a Pity Party, don't expect a large turnout.
21. The loudest voice has no greater claim to the truth than the softest.
22. Although your body will offer numerous hints, it's when your mind stops growing that marks the beginning of the end.
23. We ALL have baggage, but you don't have to carry it around with you 24/7. (Suggestion, put yours in a storage locker and just bring it out for holidays and special occasions.)
24. Pay yourself first.
25. Always leave room for one more....


Thus, feel free to add on.

*Apparently courtesy of Confucius. Who knew? I thought I was stealing it from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the Eighth Dimension"!